I9 9900k geekbench professional#

Also with 16 memory channels to populate the user has more options to purchase those very low cost low capacity 4GB ECC RDIMMS($58-$70 per DIMM) and still have 64 GB of total memory or 128GB of memory for 8GB ECC RDIMMs($100-$150 per DIMM).ĮCC memory is costly compared to non ECC memory but that’s what workstation users require if they are doing and professional production workstation workloads. Workstations are better off not with Threadripper and only 64 PCIe lanes and 4 memory channels when one could get a dual socket Epyc/SP3 MB with 16 memory channels across 2 sockets in dual Epyc 7301 configuration. The 7301($825.00) is very affordable and the cost of 2 and an Epyc/SP3 Dual Socket MB can come in at a similar cost than TR 2990wx($1,799) and MEG Creator MB($500). So its better to get 2 of the lower cost Dual Socket Epyc 7301 SKUs and have 16 total memory channels across 2 sockets if you are doing any workloads that love more memory bandwidth. For Folks that need more memory bandwidth a Dual Socket Epyc/SP3 motherboard can be had for around $450-$550(Supermicro H11DSi costs $512) and 2, 16 core/32 thread Epyc 7301s cost around the same price a one Threadripper 2990wx. Workstations are better off with Epyc and 128PCIe lanes and 8 memory channels per socket. Our benchmark score is reported as a CFD cycle frequency in Hertz.' The benchmark executable advances the Mach 0.50 AGARD flow solution. The benchmark CFD grid contains 1.23 million tetrahedral elements and 223 thousand nodes. Figure 1 shows the CFD predicted Mach contours for a freestream Mach number of 0.960.

This AGARD wing was tested at the NASA Langley Research Center in the 16-foot Transonic Dynamics Tunnel and is a standard aeroelastic test case used for validation of unsteady, compressible CFD codes. The wing uses a NACA 65A004 airfoil section and has a panel aspect ratio of 1.65, a taper ratio of 0.66, and a 45-degree quarter-chord sweep angle. 'The benchmark test case is the AGARD 445.6 aeroelastic test wing. This fluid dynamics simulation is very CPU and memory intensive. While the i9-9900K easily beats the other mainstream processors in the multi-thread test, the more interesting comparison is against the HEDT processors, with the i9-9900K only 10% behind the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X with double the core count.

I9 9900k geekbench